Can digital art be considered fine art Essay

The debate between traditional dodge and digital device has been spillage on for some time. People fence that machination is cheat so long as it involves universal expression of predilection creativity and storytelling. Whether it is done pic, music, characterisation or sculpting so long as it delivers the intended purpose. These mess suggest that the medium does not matter and all that matters is the content. Some flock argue that Digital art is not art, it is basically a parade of photo shops for people who dont know how to draw. Digital art does not involve talent emotion and insight. Anyone who underside take a photo nominate do this. Digital painters simply bash unitedly actually painters works and other various photos to form images. These people argue that digital art is computer generated therefore not literal as there are infinite copies since there is no original. This notion and acquaintance is entidepose right. Digital art is not real art because it co ntains little aspects of creativity of art and design. Un standardised like the traditional art and paintings digital works show less emotions and creativity of the artisan.Before camera invention artist had the main role off reporting the real world. machination has been changing in the subject it shows though every time its a window to real world. The invention of camera and other digital machines has rede all rightd art. The digital artists are not really gifted artists because they simply rely on the computers to produce their work. Without the computers, such artists are rendered useless. The digitalized art is not as deep and moving as the traditional art. It does not show frequently emotion like the one done using paint and crash (Horowitz, Hill & Hayes, 2009). handed-down painting depicts more originality and genuineness. It brings out the artists honest talent of creativity and imagination. On the contrary, digital art does not reveal the true capacity of the artis t. The artists extradite effective taken shortcuts. They do not entomb greater depth of creating and forming the images. Digital art does not show imagination or real creativity. Anyone with the knowledge of a computer and the camera mass merge the pictures and painting on a computer to come up with digital art. One does not really have to be talented to make digital art unless with traditional painting it is however for the talented who are able to reach out to the audience in a more natural way. tralatitious art is more in effect(p) in conveying the artists message. The fact that the audience washbowl see and even feel the piece of art gives traditional painting an upper hand than the digitalized art. No printer or computer can paint in impasto. For fine art, thick and textured paint is what makes the painting unique and special. The digital print is less unique because of the uniform surface. Traditional art is more is more involving than the digital one, the artist has t o pay anxiety to details in order to bring out the message or reach out to the audience. This gives traditional art more value. Traditional art has a special unique effect to the audience it feels more real and easy to relate to. Research shows that people have a pause understanding and connection to things they can see touch and smell than things, which they incisively see.Digital art is not an artists inventiveness scarcely rather it is it is modification and merging of different pictures. Digital art like music, is a computerized copy mere fabrication and modification of true art programs and numerical cord. It has less to do with creativity. Traditional art is rarely replicated but digital art is replicated in many ways. This dilutes the aspect of art since fine art is supposed to be original.In digital art, a somebody has anonymity from construction and immunity to error. Clicking print and undo cannot be considered satisfactory to brush work. Digital art is a mere manipul ation of the real and traditional art. It is just meant for convenience in terms of accessibility and liberalisation . An artist is able to create many pieces of art in a shorter time using the digital medium. People prefer accessing the arts by dint of the digitalized devices but a person who appreciates real arts goes to the galleries and exhibition stores just to feel and acknowledge the real thrill. Digital art is meant for people who have less interest in fine art. The interested people and artist who value art prefer the traditional art as they can relate and derive better meaning from it compared to the digital art (Quora, 2014). mop upAs much as art is art, detail and degree of authenticity matters. Art is all about originality and creativity and digital art depict less of these qualities. This makes digital art to be considered irrelevant when compared to traditional art. Traditional art involves pure talent while digital art is plainly the duplication and merging of dif ferent arts that already existed. Traditional art is easier to connect and relate to because they can be touched and seen at the akin time.ReferencesHorowitz, P., Hill, W., & Hayes, T. C. (2009). The art of electronics (Vol. 2, p. 658). Cambridge Cambridge university press.Quora. Is digital really art?- December 2014. 10 Dec.2014 http//www.quora.com/Is-digital-art-really-art initiation document